Davyd ([info]davyd) wrote,
@ 2005-04-22 13:24:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: tired

observations on geeks (pt 2) and other stories
So, as well as the class of geek I have classed as the Adrians, there is a class of geek we will now refer to as the Alexes. These are the anally retentive geeks who won't let you experiment and play with things because it might possibly be a little silly. Commonly identified as stick in the muds. They spend so long thinking something through, that they never actually get to do it. They like to populate positions of pseudo-power, like being conference organisers. Resultantly, when you have developed a neutrally buoyant helium balloon and aluminium can rig, they sulk when you try to test it out. It seems that this species of geek has either been burnt in the past, and refuses to get back on the horse, or lacks the lateral problem solving skills to work out how to undo any unforseen side effects.

Two speakers dropped out of the conference, forcing the organisers to have to refactor the talks for the day. They managed to completely bust the time I had spent finding swaps to keep the talks in interesting, related streams; even though I feel that they could have kept it so that related talks could have been kept sequential, rather then simultaneously. In general, I think the organisers are awfully stressed, and should in general try to lighten up. I don't recall anyone being anywhere near that serious in Perth.

In other news, I have a purple shirt, it makes me undetectable if I remain still. Hopefully this is more coherent then my last couple of posts, however the lack of sleep makes structured language hard. Topic focus is not a skill I currently have. The organisers should smile more.



(Post a new comment)

metaphors!
(Anonymous)
2005-04-22 05:34 am UTC (link)
"It seems that this species of geek has either been burnt in the past, and refuses to get back on the horse"

What a wonderfully mixed metaphor. Was it an extremely hot horse? Inquiring minds demand to know!

(Reply to this)


[info]theducks
2005-04-22 06:53 am UTC (link)
In my arrogance, I can't help but think I am the prototype for this, but I'm not sure why. Surely a packrat or a grahame might be better. I try to be open to new things, and even when burnt I won't run from technology.

But there you go.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]davyd
2005-04-22 06:56 am UTC (link)
We have defined a whole list of UCS-based-stereotypes:
- the Adrian,
- the Alex,
- the Grahame (I am a Grahame), and
- the Tearles

I had forgotten the Packrat, since I haven't run into any Packrat-esque geeks this week. I'm also not sure how to classify James.

Sorry to distill you down to a stereotype and all ;)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-04-23 02:15 pm UTC (link)
Just for the record, it was an organiser who built the neutrally buoyant helium balloon and aluminium can rig and brought it into the conference area and flew it around the atrium area.

Perhaps you hadn't noticed all of the "no food or drink" signs on the entrances to all of the lecture theatres?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]davyd
2005-04-23 02:47 pm UTC (link)
Whoever tied the balloons to the can, conceivably an organiser, made it negatively buoyant. It's pretty much akin to tying balloons to a brick.

Bernard successfully made it neutrally buoyant the first time, James and myself spent significantly longer the second.

The "No food or drink" warning would have been pertinent had any of the system actually involved food or drink. There was a partially small amount of liquid ballast in the can, however this consisted of pure drinking water.

Your average, sweaty geek secretes much more in the course of an hour, with a lot more nasty smelling aromatics then was contained in that can by the time it was balanced (somewhere in the order of magnitude of about 4mL by my guess).

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…